ONE
The quote above, “Dance, dance or we are lost,” was her mantra. It is also the subtitle of a new film in 3-D by Wim Wenders that opens in February after its premiere at the Berlin Film Festival. Pina Bausch, to whom Wenders dedicates the film, is the founder and driving force of a dance company with the rather unwieldy name—Tanztheater Wuppertal. At the time of her death on June 30, 2009 at age 68 she was widely regarded as the foremost choreographer of our time. Here is a trailer for the film.
pina: tanzt, tanzt songst sind wir verloren link
If some of the dance moves seem familiar it may be because you recognize them from another film: Pedro Almodovar’s Talk to Her. That film features several scenes of Bausch and her company, taken mostly from her large-scale work, Café Müller. Here is the trailer for Talk to Her with several glimpses of the company.
Pina (Philippina) Bausch was born in 1940 in the “City of Blades,” Solingen, located in west-central Germany. It is likely you have kitchen knives made there, as the city has been associated for centuries with highest quality steel. Bausch’s “incisive” dance techniques are wrought of the same aesthetic. Her lean, edgy body is honed to a razor fine edge.
She seemed indestructible, a dynamo who created hundreds of dance works. On the last day of June 2009, however, her indefatigable body failed her and she succumbed to cancer— five days after diagnosis.
TWO
Stravinsky’s music for the ballet, The Rite of Spring, has been choreographed over 180 times since the notorious 1913 Nijinsky premiere. None of these iterations has had the raw, primal power of Bausch’s, which is so earthy that her version is performed on a stage covered with peat moss. Here is the final section, the dance of “The Chosen One,” the virgin as a sacrifice to the pagan god of Spring (sorry, the video is stretched). At 2:45 Malou Airaudo begins her frenzied dance to the death:
No. It’s not Swan Lake. But is it even ballet? Bausch called her company “Dance Theater,” a term that goes back to Weimar Republic cabaret of the 1920s. What Bausch has done is to mine the domain of theater with its urgent existential themes of life, love and death; from this matter she has crafted powerful dramas of character that are as much about exploring psychic conflict as they are about dance. Many pieces incorporate speech (a “verboten” in traditional dance). Her movement vocabulary is as challenging as the most demanding traditional ballet but its metaphors are jagged, disjunctive, reflecting the confusion and malaise of life today.
The irony is that Bausch developed this unruly vision out of classical training. By age 14. she had danced in the Solingen Children’s Ballet and had began to study under Kurt Jooss at the Folkwang School in Essen. Jooss taught a less rigid dance style that still incorporated the basic rules of ballet. While there, Bausch was also exposed to many other arts that formed the school’s eclectic arts curriculum: the Folkwang was not solely a dance school. Armed with a government grant, she left for the United States and became a special student at the Julliard School. New York City was then the world’s dance mecca. George Balanchine’s glacial formalism reigned supreme at City Ballet. Her already incipient free-form inclinations were further developed there under Jose Limon, Paul Taylor and Anthony Tudor; it was the latter who created a dance for her that included 587 arabesques, 224 jetés and 184 turns: so much for her ballet bona fides. She also had a stint as dancer in the MetOpera Ballet. Taylor once described her as “one of the thinnest human beings I’ve ever seen. [She could] streak across the floor sharply, though a bit unevenly, like calipers across paper… She’s also able to move slower than a clogged-up bicycle pump.”
For many, this duality of classical style and breakaway free form could have augured schizophrenia in technique, but for Bausch it was fodder for a rapidly developing aesthetic of her own. Returning to Germany on Jooss’s invitation to dance for his Tanzstudio, she performed many of his works, assisting him in developing new pieces. In 1973, the director of Wuppertal Theaters, Arno Wüstenhöfer, chose her to head the Wuppertal Ballet, a traditional company, in the city not far from her birth town of Solingen. She had come full circle in her travels—but the singular trip she was now to take became a global sprint into new artistic terrain. Within a year, she had renamed the company Tanztheater Wuppertal. There was no turning back. Two of the last pieces she did in anything resembling traditional ballet form were in fact “dance operas,” based on works by the classical era composer Christoph Willibald Gluck. The first of the pair was Iphigenia in Tauris.
The unleashed energy (Dance of the Furies) is pure Bausch, even in embryonic form; the choreography still pays homage to ballet’s sweeping and graceful gestures but tugs hard at the seams:
The next year, 1975, she created Orpheus and Eurydice. The “dance of the blessed spirits” models itself, in a non-ironic nod, to the lyrical tropes of classical ballet.
But the sweeping port de bras bears little resemblance to Petipa or Fokine. This beautiful dance was both her homage and farewell to classical dance.
Her Rite of Spring was a leap into her future. Within the next three years, her work had evolved so far away from “ballet” that many in the company abandoned her. But she forged on with a singular vision and began to create a new style incorporating simpler movement patterns and an exploration of emotional states. Actors and non-dancers were invited to help create these new works: a technique akin to the way director Mike Leigh develops his movies. The biography on her website, written by Nobert Servos, says:
Yet in making this unusual move, Pina Bausch had finally found the form her work would take, its dream-like, poetic imagery and bodily language justifying the worldwide success she soon achieved. In taking people’s essential emotions as its starting point – their fears and needs, wishes and desires—the Tanztheater Wuppertal was not only able to be understood throughout the world, it sparked an international choreographic revolution.
Pina Bausch’s dance theatre risks taking an unflinching look at reality, yet at the same time invites us to dream. It takes the spectators’ everyday lives seriously, yet at the same time buoys up their hopes that everything can change for the better. For their part, they are required to take responsibility themselves. All the men and women in Pina Bausch’s pieces can do is test out, with the utmost precision and honesty, what brings each and every one closer to happiness, and what pushes them further from it; they cannot offer a panacea. They always, however, leave their public in the certainty that—despite all its ups and downs—they will survive life.
In Bausch’s own words, she says she strives to create “a space where we can encounter each other.” That space is the theater stage. This is not to say that her acclaim was universal and instantaneous. The dance critic for the English Daily Telegraph described one piece as “more walk-theatre than dance-theatre, with some choice specimen walks on offer—the supermodel slink, the slapper’s strut, the shuffle of the most slovenly waitress in the world”. The esteemed critic for The New Yorker, Arlene Croce, wrote (according to NY Times obit writer Daniel J. Wakin) that her work was
glum, despondent, dabbling in theatrical Dada,” pointlessly repetitive, marked by “thin but flashy shtick” suggestive of the “pornography of pain.”
There is no doubt that Bausch’s work comes from a deeply visceral place. In explaining her approach to an interviewer from Le Figaro, she explained that she requires more than technique from her dancers:
I look for something else… the possibility of making them feel what each gesture means internally. Everything must come from the heart, must be lived.
Filmmaker Lee Yanor made a 3-minute video portrait of Bausch in Paris’ Café Le Mistral in 2002. The opening hand play is reminiscent of Stieglitz’s iconic photos of the hands of Georgia O’Keeffe. The dancer in red is Christiani Morganti, in an excerpt (I think) from Danzon.
A slideshow of Bausch dance pieces are at the NY Times website.
New York Times slideshow—“Remembering Pina Bausch” link
In 1983, Bausch appeared as the Principessa Lherimia in a Fellini film. She explains to the assembled dinner guests her concept of sound/color synethesia, a topic I discussed in a piece I wrote last year about the Kandinsky retrospective at the Guggenheim.
John’s Bailiwick: “Subway to Synesthesia” link
Here is the clip from Fellini’s E La Nave Va (And the Ship Sails On). The first 10 seconds only are pixellated.
In 1990, Bausch made a feature length film titled Die Klage der Kaiserin (The Complaint of the Empress). It was her only directorial venture in feature film. Here is an excerpt.
If you are bold enough to tackle a fuller exploration of her theater/dance concepts, the full film is here in eight parts:
A beautifully lyrical excerpt from a larger piece titled Walzer illustrates how Bausch strove to integrate dancers from her company with ordinary people she recruited in her travels for city specific commissions. This haunting dance is the antithesis of much of the deliberately confrontational work she was known for.
One of Bausch’s most acclaimed and demanding works is Café Müller. As a child in the working class town of Solingen, she worked in the restaurant attached to the small hotel that her parents ran. The ebb and flow of patrons, with its constantly unfolding drama of intimate stories observed, served to inspire her later work. Café Müller is its embodiment.
All five parts are available on YouTube if you want to follow its narrative through line. But it is at the beginning of this third part that we can see Bausch at her most sublime, an ethereal white-robed presence in a congeries of chairs kicked and strewn about by darkly dressed male dancers. The accompanying aria “When I Am Laid in Earth” is from Henry Purcell’s opera Dido and Aeneas.
Bausch and her company performed a number of times in Los Angeles. They opened the 1984 Olympic Arts festival in the Pasadena Civic Auditorium performing the Rite of Spring. A number of front row spectators present that night were covered in peat moss and dust by the time the “Chosen One” expired. Robert Fitzpatrick, artistic director of the festival, recalls in the LA Times obituary piece on Bausch that he offered to pay the patrons’ dry cleaning bills.
In 1996, Bausch presented her “Americana” piece at the LA Music Center: a 3-½ hour dance poem to the Southwest and the California redwood forests. It was called Nur Du (Only You). The title came from the 1956 hit of The Platters that was featured at a high point in the dance drama. This was the only time I saw Tanztheater Wuppertal. Carol and I had front row seats, the only ones available on short notice. I worried we would be too close. From the perspective of overall aesthetic evaluation, it may have been so. But I have never before felt so inside a dance experience. Part of it may have been sheer proximity to the action—but I believe that the powerful humanity and life force of Bausch’s work shoots like an arrow through any sized auditorium and pierces your heart to the quick.
I can’t imagine she would find any more appropriate tribute to her life and work than the white-suited R&B group, The Platters, with Tony Williams, singing as partners to her dance.
Next week: A second look at Joao Silva and the year in photo-journalism.











John, There has to be another name than simply ‘blog’ for what you post from week-to-week. The site continues to be informative, imaginative and entertaining. One can only imagine the breadth of your imagination, the number of hours spent over numerous weeks to formulate each post, despite the hectic shooting schedules of your ‘day’ jobs. And we are of course grateful you are willing to share these posts with us. For me your site is a multi-level, digital gallery containing numerous one-of-a-kind installations, pictures at an exhibition, around and between which I can walk back and forth, at my own pace. These “pictures” are the artists you profile, their ideas, works and experience. Because of the way they are presented, we want to know more of who the artists are and, often, who we are. The site is a paradigm for instruction that schools should emulate. The site invokes people, events and ideas, historical and current. It crystallizes present and past aesthetics. It spans centuries. It evokes dialectic. It provides a multi-dimensional experience: Ideas, Voices, Music, Pictures, Word Images and Videos that elicit feelings, desires and memories, that inspire one’s imagination. When I explore the site, I discover segments of my Self. I’m made aware of shared public experience and private, personal experience. Your “Pina Bausch: ‘Dance, Dance Or We Are Lost’” does all that for me. A flaneur of the arts, an observer on the boulevard of culture, I’ve paid some attention to modern and post-modern dance and even performed in experimental theatre. I’m eager to see Herzog’s film — because it presents a great dancer and (of course) because it’s in stereo.
John’s reply: Fred, you are too generous but thank you so much. I follow my own totally eclectic impulses for subject matter. If there is a topic that intrigues me, that generates the research. It’s a way of just focusing my sometimes too rambling interests. And I always learn so much for myself, such as with Pina Bausch or with the Yugoslav SPOMENIK memorials that will be the topic in a few weeks. Or next week’s piece on Kodachrome which led me to consider the current state of KODAK, a scenario that was painful to contemplate.
John,
I just finished reading your blog, nay beautiful treatise on Pina Bausch. Once I started I couldn’t stop.
I confess to being hypnotized by the video of “Dance of the Blessed Spirits.” It’s just so wonderful behold. You’ll make me a fan of Ballet yet!
Thank you so much for all the thought you put into these blogs; they’re just spectacular.
Thanks,
Rob
for john…..
it is very difficult to stay calm yet be to the point in writing to someone whose outstanding contribution to cinema and visuality
has added to the glory of the medium….also for me who loves cinema…
this blog helps to converge thoughts…devoid of restlessness yet
varied….maybe like the work that people like you do…for whom cinema is still great…even after 100 years..
my regards
dicky banerjee
kolkata/india
Dear John,
A wonderful essay on Pina Bausch who I only discovered this year after my sister attended a performance by her company (sans Pina) at BAM a few months back. I was riveted to Die Klage der Kaiserin when I explored the video on You Tube. Her sphinx scene at table with her confidant and the swirling of smoke and the perfect percussive sound track haunts me still. She sets you on a barge down the Nile and yet the Deco style is of her own time. Without knowing where you will stop you are fully served with a captivation without beginning or exact end. A circling that follows and leads at once. A laughter that is only hers – that powerful voice somewhat surprising as it emerges from a depth mysterious and seems so large for her dainty form. When I watch a scene I love with Pina Bausch – I do what a child would do – watch it over and over again.
I was just thinking of the Berlinale that kicks off on Thursday, and how she might have inspired Jafar Panahi or been inspired by him. I will look forward to Wim Wenders’ film release. The strangest beauty of the cinema is embedded in the souls of those who think the film and those who act it, score it dance it – I loved your tribute at the end – we have some music here in the USA – don’t we!
There is a lingering quality to Pina’s creations and they follow me from time to time in deja-vu as I am sure she has affected others. I can feel the mystery that longs and yearns to with the interpretive execution
Thanks John,
Belle
PS – Wonder if you might be thinking of John Barry these days. I cannot stop. The theme from King Kong is going around in my head.
John’s reply:
Belle,
It’s gratifying to hear your appreciation of Bausch. She was an icon of German culture who was sadly not as well known here. I hope the Wenders film will change that. There is a wonderful article in the weekly Hollywood Reporter of Feb. 9 by Scott Roxborough about the Bausch film to premiere in Berlin. Wenders talks about how long he had been dreaming of doing this film with Bausch and that he had dinner with her only eight days before she died. He had already delayed making the film many times, until he felt 3-D technology could effectively capture dance movement. I think this film will mark a qualitative leap forward in 3-D filmmaking.
Dear John,
Thank you so very much for your reference to Scott Roxborough’s piece in the Hollywood Reporter. I will definitely read it.
Once again, your enthusiasm for sharing and teaching is illustrated in your kind response to my note to you. I just love your Baliwick.
I couldn’t agree more with Frederick Goodich, ASC. You are a generous and fascinating teacher who shares with us all glimpses behind the curtain, and the holism of evocative arts that are what make life a continuum of questions and dialogue, and the art that tries to answer.
If there were a way to define what I feel about the best teaching in the world, it would include a reference to yours. I can’t thank you enough for your open-door here and your choices of subject that are always provocative, and shown in your own awesome lighting.
Frederick’s reference to the Pictures at an Exhibition was great! There is MUSIC to your writing, and inspiration, and the effects of mystery, dream and all the other elements that make cinema one of the greatest of all art forms – combining at once the emotional range of human desires and gratefulness at being exposed.
One of my very favorite musicians in the world is a woman who also has a genius for sharing and teaching what she knows or is discovering. Marian McPartland has been playing her piano over the decades with many a gifted artist – which to me is akin to lovemaking. The act of loving what one is doing in an ensemble is in a way what music can be. I suspect that the teamwork of cinema is natural in the same way. When I hear Marian’s laughing voice or a hushed acknowledgement of awe at her appreciation of another artist, I am aware of her own voice as another instrument of her music. But above all, it is the assurance of her giving that reinforces what the real value of human life is – and that is the ability to share it.
When we ponder anything as grand as the life of a lion family brought to consciousness in a film such as Born Free, that soaring gratitude (for me) to a higher power is lifted up by the scoring of John Barry. Or a fantasy such as King Kong with a love theme that is memorable. And so it goes. The act of sharing is so much fun and so wonder filled too. Thanks John for your own version of that.
Belle
John’s reply:
Belle, your observations are deeply appreciated; thank you for the effusive support. The writing of these pieces is a selfish personal reward for me. Most of us are tossed about every day by so many information sources. These essays compel me to settle down and concentrate on a single subject– and, importantly, learn more about something that I thought I already knew something about. It’s a revelation for me to discover how astray my head often is when I start these pieces. The subjects force me to hunker down and meet them one on one.